Why do home inspectors sometimes specify further evaluation and possible repair instead of a specific repair or replacement?
Monday, June 18, 2018
It would be great if home inspectors could open up a wall behind staining and find out what’s going on in there. But they can’t do that without permission of the home’s seller, and it is very rarely granted. So inspectors often have to depend on visual evidence, which is a symptom of something not accessible to view or test, to make a statement. The problem may be an ongoing one, or it may just be the result of a one-time event. And there are often several different defects that could cause the same symptom.
Also, inspectors today depend on a collection of high-tech testing tools like a moisture meter, infrared camera, and circuit tester, that can sometimes give misleading readings. So, for all these reasons, unless the inspector can see and clearly understand what is causing a problem, a sensible inspector—and, specifically, one that doesn’t want to be accused of recommending repair of the problem that no longer exists or exaggerating a minor one—will recommend further evaluation rather than trying to guess at the extent of the problem and the necessary repair.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
To learn more strategies for getting the best possible home inspection, here’s a few of our other blog posts:
To read about issues related to homes of particular type or one built in a specific decade, visit one of these blog posts:
How To Look At A House
McGarry and Madsen's home inspection blog for buyers of
site-built, mobile/manfuactured and modular homes
for Links to Collections
of Blog Posts